Compare Arphie vs Loopio on live-source AI, content libraries, pricing, questionnaires, integrations, security, and team fit using verified evidence.
Knowledge agents to enable GTM teams
High-volume RFP and DDQ response with AI first drafts and source-backed review
AI-powered RFP and questionnaire response software for collaborative teams
High-volume RFP/RFI response with reusable approved content, AI-assisted first drafts, and CRM-connected collaboration
Arphie is the stronger fit when the buying team wants live retrieval, citations, freshness controls, unlimited collaborators, and named SIG and CAIQ coverage in an AI-native workflow. Loopio is the safer operational choice when platform maturity, a structured content library, document automation, a public API, broad enterprise certifications, and a conventional proposal-team rollout matter more.
You want reviewers to see current sources rather than rely mainly on a maintained answer library.
You want a mature response-management system with established enterprise operations.
These are editorial interpretations of the verified fields below—not vendor scores.
Arphie retrieves from connected knowledge and enablement systems, cites sources, flags stale content, and consolidates duplicate answers with Smart Merge.
Loopio centers a reusable approved-content library with AI-assisted drafts, document automation, review workflows, task routing, and analytics.
Arphie does not publish list prices or allowances but describes concurrent-project pricing with unlimited users and core capabilities at every tier.
Loopio does not publish current dollar prices but names three packages; Foundations includes 10 seats, while onboarding, translations, and some integrations may be add-ons.
Arphie combines source-backed drafting, collaboration, Quick-Ask, MCP access, and response analytics in a newer platform with a smaller public review base.
Loopio brings a longer operating history, a broad customer base, established proposal workflows, public API access, and a deeper current certification set.
Arphie publishes SOC 2 Type II, encryption, audit logs, role-based access, several SSO providers, and US hosting. SCIM and additional regions remain unconfirmed.
Loopio publishes SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, CSA STAR, encryption, audit logs, and role-based access. SCIM and residency regions remain unconfirmed.
Public evidence is normalized without currency conversion or inferred feature parity.
| Decision field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Published starting price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Charging basis | Custom scope | Flat rate |
| Public plan names | No public plan matrix | FoundationsEnhancedEnterprise |
| Target team sizes | SMBMidMarketEnterprise | MidMarketEnterprise |
| Named questionnaire formats | SIGCAIQDDQCustom | SIGDDQCustom |
| Collaboration controls | Co-editingCommentingReview workflowsApproval workflowsProgress trackingRole-based accessNotifications | Co-editingCommentingApproval workflowsTask assignmentNotifications |
| CRM integrations | Salesforce | Salesforce |
| Cloud storage | Google DriveSharePointDropboxBox | Google DriveSharePointOneDriveBox |
| Communication tools | Slack | SlackMicrosoft Teams |
| SSO and provisioning | OktaMicrosoft AzureOneLoginADFSGoogle authenticationSCIM not publicly confirmed | OktaOneLoginMicrosoft AzureADFSGoogle SSOSCIM not publicly confirmed |
| Public security controls | SOC 2 Type IIAudit logsRole-based access | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 42001CSA STARAudit logsRole-based access |
| Data residency | US | Not publicly confirmed |
A named capability confirms documented scope, not implementation quality. Test the relevant cluster with your own sources and response format.
Published plans are entry evidence, not guaranteed quotes. Normalize users, project volume, AI usage, modules, onboarding, support, and renewal terms.
Contact sales · Custom scope
No list prices or project allowances are published. Current first-party material says pricing is based on concurrent projects, with unlimited users and all core capabilities at every tier. SSO and premium support may cost extra. G2 marks a free trial as available, but Arphie does not publish its duration or terms.
Contact sales · Flat rate
10 seats included
The former $20,000/year public floor was absent on 2026-08-19 and has been removed. Project translations, onboarding packages, and industry integrations are add-ons.
Each product keeps its own review date and source registry. Unknown public evidence is disclosed instead of converted into a losing score.
13 reviewed sources
8 reviewed sources
Request current reports, subprocessors, retention, model-training terms, and contract controls.
Compare time to an approved submission, not time to the first generated draft.
Use the same users, volume, modules, services, term, and renewal assumptions.
Product facts come from the linked source registries. Pair-specific verdicts and takeaways are editorial analysis based on the same normalized fields; unknown public evidence stays unknown and no vendor can pay for placement or a favorable conclusion.
13 checked · 10 official
8 checked · 7 official
Use the full RFP evaluation criteria, verified pricing matrix, and research methodology to keep the pilot reproducible.
Arphie emphasizes live knowledge retrieval, source citations, freshness controls, and concurrent-project pricing with unlimited users. Loopio emphasizes a governed content library, mature response operations, document automation, task routing, analytics, and enterprise extension through a public API.
Neither publishes a current complete dollar price. Arphie explains that pricing is based on concurrent projects with unlimited users. Loopio names Foundations, Enhanced, and Enterprise and states that Foundations includes 10 seats. Both require a quote for total cost.
Loopio publishes the broader certification set, including ISO 27001, ISO 42001, and CSA STAR alongside SOC 2 Type II. Arphie publishes SOC 2 Type II and a clear US-hosting statement plus encryption, audit logs, role-based access, and named SSO providers.
