Compare AutoRFP.ai vs Loopio on pricing, portal completion, content governance, integrations, security, collaboration, and enterprise fit.
AI-first RFP platform with cited answers and unlimited users
Multi-contributor RFP and tender response with cited AI, original-format export, and project-based pricing
AI-powered RFP and questionnaire response software for collaborative teams
High-volume RFP/RFI response with reusable approved content, AI-assisted first drafts, and CRM-connected collaboration
AutoRFP.ai is the clearer choice when published annual project allowances, unlimited users, portal completion, original-format export, regional hosting, SCIM, and included implementation are decisive. Loopio is the stronger fit when a mature content-library workflow, established adoption, named package levels, broad certifications, and a general public API outweigh transparent project pricing.
You want an inclusive project model and automation through the final delivery surface.
You want a mature response program centered on approved reusable content.
These are editorial interpretations of the verified fields below—not vendor scores.
AutoRFP.ai publishes $10,788 per year for 24 projects and $15,588 per year for 50 projects, with unlimited users and all features, SSO, integrations, implementation, support, and training included.
Loopio publishes Foundations, Enhanced, and Enterprise but no current dollar price. Foundations includes 10 seats; onboarding, translations, and some integrations can be add-ons.
AutoRFP.ai explicitly covers browser and procurement portals, requirements extraction, source Trust Scores, approvals, original-format export, and progress analytics.
Loopio emphasizes a centralized approved-content library, AI-assisted drafts, document automation, task routing, approvals, and response analytics.
AutoRFP.ai publishes SCIM, ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, three hosting regions, audit logs, encryption, role-based access, and multiple SSO options.
Loopio publishes SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, CSA STAR, audit logs, encryption, role-based access, and several SSO providers; SCIM and residency are unconfirmed.
AutoRFP.ai documents regional MCP endpoints, browser extensions, major AI assistants, CRM, repositories, chat, and knowledge systems; a general REST API is not documented.
Loopio documents Salesforce, repositories, chat, enablement systems, Microsoft 365 Copilot, SSO, and a general public developer API.
Public evidence is normalized without currency conversion or inferred feature parity.
| Decision field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Published starting price | $899/mo | Contact sales |
| Charging basis | Per project | Flat rate |
| Public plan names | ScaleAccelerateEnterprise | FoundationsEnhancedEnterprise |
| Target team sizes | SMBMidMarketEnterprise | MidMarketEnterprise |
| Named questionnaire formats | DDQCustom | SIGDDQCustom |
| Collaboration controls | Co-editingCommentingReview workflowsApproval workflowsTask assignmentProgress trackingNotificationsVersion control | Co-editingCommentingApproval workflowsTask assignmentNotifications |
| CRM integrations | Salesforce | Salesforce |
| Cloud storage | BoxGoogle DriveOneDriveSharePoint | Google DriveSharePointOneDriveBox |
| Communication tools | SlackMicrosoft TeamsEmail | SlackMicrosoft Teams |
| SSO and provisioning | OktaMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft SSOGoogle WorkspaceSCIM | OktaOneLoginMicrosoft AzureADFSGoogle SSOSCIM not publicly confirmed |
| Public security controls | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022Audit logsRole-based access | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 42001CSA STARAudit logsRole-based access |
| Data residency | US West (Oregon)EU Central (Frankfurt)Australia East (Sydney) | Not publicly confirmed |
A named capability confirms documented scope, not implementation quality. Test the relevant cluster with your own sources and response format.
Published plans are entry evidence, not guaranteed quotes. Normalize users, project volume, AI usage, modules, onboarding, support, and renewal terms.
$899/mo · Per project
Unlimited users
Unlimited users
Unlimited users
All plans include all features, AI, content, SSO, integrations, implementation, support, and training. Conditional 30-day money-back guarantee; minimum 12-month term after the first 30 days.
Contact sales · Flat rate
10 seats included
The former $20,000/year public floor was absent on 2026-08-19 and has been removed. Project translations, onboarding packages, and industry integrations are add-ons.
Each product keeps its own review date and source registry. Unknown public evidence is disclosed instead of converted into a losing score.
9 reviewed sources
8 reviewed sources
Request current reports, subprocessors, retention, model-training terms, and contract controls.
Compare time to an approved submission, not time to the first generated draft.
Use the same users, volume, modules, services, term, and renewal assumptions.
Product facts come from the linked source registries. Pair-specific verdicts and takeaways are editorial analysis based on the same normalized fields; unknown public evidence stays unknown and no vendor can pay for placement or a favorable conclusion.
9 checked · 8 official
8 checked · 7 official
Use the full RFP evaluation criteria, verified pricing matrix, and research methodology to keep the pilot reproducible.
AutoRFP.ai is more transparent: it publishes $10,788 per year for 24 projects and $15,588 per year for 50 projects with unlimited users. Loopio names its packages and a 10-seat Foundations scope but does not publish current dollar prices.
AutoRFP.ai explicitly documents browser and procurement-portal completion, requirements extraction, and original-format export. Loopio documents strong document automation and response workflows, but portal execution is not the same named emphasis in its verified profile.
Both publish substantial evidence. AutoRFP.ai is clearer on SCIM and selectable US, EU, and Australian hosting. Loopio publishes the broader certification set, including ISO 42001 and CSA STAR, and has a longer enterprise operating record.
