Compare Loopio vs Responsive on RFP workflows, pricing structure, AI, integrations, security, content governance, and enterprise fit using verified evidence.
AI-powered RFP and questionnaire response software for collaborative teams
High-volume RFP/RFI response with reusable approved content, AI-assisted first drafts, and CRM-connected collaboration
AI-powered strategic response management for RFPs and questionnaires
High-volume RFP/RFI and proposal work with approved content, AI-assisted drafting, and governed review
Loopio is the more focused choice for established proposal teams that want a mature content library, familiar response workflow, major business-system integrations, and a clearly named 10-seat entry package. Responsive is the broader enterprise platform when unlimited response projects, guest collaboration, requirements analysis, trust-center workflows, SCIM, and a larger CRM and automation footprint justify a more complex rollout.
You want a mature RFP system centered on governed content reuse and adoption.
You need response work to connect with broader enterprise intake and trust programs.
These are editorial interpretations of the verified fields below—not vendor scores.
Loopio publishes Foundations, Enhanced, and Enterprise packages. Foundations includes 10 seats and 10 customizable themes, but current dollar pricing and expansion-seat pricing require a quote.
Responsive publishes Emerging, Growth, and Enterprise editions with unlimited response projects, content, and collaboration. Price combines a platform fee, user licenses, and add-ons or services.
Loopio concentrates on reusable approved content, AI-assisted drafts, document automation, collaboration, task routing, approvals, and response analytics.
Responsive adds requirements extraction, quality audit, guest access, a no-code agent builder, trust-center workflows, intake, and broader strategic-response tooling.
Loopio documents Salesforce, four cloud repositories, Slack, Teams, Microsoft 365 Copilot, enablement tools, SSO, and a public API.
Responsive documents four CRMs, major storage and chat tools, office applications, enablement systems, ChatGPT, MCP, SAML, SCIM, and a public API.
Loopio publishes SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, CSA STAR, encryption, audit logs, and role-based access. Public SCIM and residency regions remain unconfirmed.
Responsive publishes SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1, SCIM, audit logs, and role-based access. Public encryption specifics and residency regions remain unconfirmed.
Public evidence is normalized without currency conversion or inferred feature parity.
| Decision field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Published starting price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Charging basis | Flat rate | Custom scope |
| Public plan names | FoundationsEnhancedEnterprise | Emerging EditionGrowth EditionEnterprise Edition |
| Target team sizes | MidMarketEnterprise | MidMarketEnterprise |
| Named questionnaire formats | SIGDDQCustom | SIGCAIQDDQCustom |
| Collaboration controls | Co-editingCommentingApproval workflowsTask assignmentNotifications | Co-editingCommentingReview workflowsApproval workflowsTask assignmentProgress trackingGuest access |
| CRM integrations | Salesforce | SalesforceHubSpotMicrosoft Dynamics 365Zoho |
| Cloud storage | Google DriveSharePointOneDriveBox | SharePointGoogle DriveOneDriveDropbox |
| Communication tools | SlackMicrosoft Teams | SlackMicrosoft Teams |
| SSO and provisioning | OktaOneLoginMicrosoft AzureADFSGoogle SSOSCIM not publicly confirmed | SAML 2.0OktaSCIM |
| Public security controls | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 42001CSA STARAudit logsRole-based access | SOC 2ISO 27001ISO 27701ISO 42001CSA STAR Level 1Audit logsRole-based access |
| Data residency | Not publicly confirmed | Not publicly confirmed |
A named capability confirms documented scope, not implementation quality. Test the relevant cluster with your own sources and response format.
Published plans are entry evidence, not guaranteed quotes. Normalize users, project volume, AI usage, modules, onboarding, support, and renewal terms.
Contact sales · Flat rate
10 seats included
The former $20,000/year public floor was absent on 2026-08-19 and has been removed. Project translations, onboarding packages, and industry integrations are add-ons.
Contact sales · Custom scope
Price is built from an annual platform fee, user licenses, and add-ons/services. Projects and responses are unlimited. The former Lite edition is no longer listed.
Each product keeps its own review date and source registry. Unknown public evidence is disclosed instead of converted into a losing score.
8 reviewed sources
12 reviewed sources
Request current reports, subprocessors, retention, model-training terms, and contract controls.
Compare time to an approved submission, not time to the first generated draft.
Use the same users, volume, modules, services, term, and renewal assumptions.
Product facts come from the linked source registries. Pair-specific verdicts and takeaways are editorial analysis based on the same normalized fields; unknown public evidence stays unknown and no vendor can pay for placement or a favorable conclusion.
8 checked · 7 official
12 checked · 11 official
Use the full RFP evaluation criteria, verified pricing matrix, and research methodology to keep the pilot reproducible.
Neither vendor publishes a complete current dollar price. Loopio exposes a Foundations scope with 10 seats, while Responsive says its quote combines a platform fee, user licenses, and add-ons or services and includes unlimited projects. Compare the same users, occasional contributors, integrations, implementation, support, and renewal terms.
Loopio is the more focused fit for teams prioritizing a mature content-library and response workflow. Responsive is the broader fit when requirements analysis, guest collaboration, trust workflows, agents, SCIM, and a wider CRM ecosystem are part of the same program.
Yes. Loopio explicitly names SIG, DDQ, and custom workflows. Responsive names SIG, CAIQ, DDQ, and custom workflows and also publishes trust-center capabilities. Test the exact spreadsheet, portal, approvals, and evidence requirements used by the security team.
